On May 01, 2012, at 08:24 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote: >Oops, I missed your reference to PEP 402 and PEP 420. Sorry about that. > >It is indeed 420 that would replace 402. And the older PEP 382. Once 420 is accepted, we should simply reject 382 and 402. At that point, I'll update them to point to 420. -Barry