[Python-Dev] Adding types.build_class for 3.3

[Nick Coghlan]

Given that the statement form is referred to as a "class definition", and
this is the dynamic equivalent, I'm inclined to go with "type.define()".
Dynamic type definition is more consistent with existing terminology than
dynamic type creation.

--
Sent from my phone, thus the relative brevity :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20120510/9d2f9f8b/attachment.html>