[Python-Dev] sys.implementation

Eric Snow ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com
Sat May 12 04:40:46 CEST 2012


On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:57 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> sys.implementation.metadata looks like a completely over-engineered
> concept. Please, let's just make sys.implementation a dict and stop
> bothering about ordering and iterability.

I'm fine with ditching "metadata".  The PEP will say
sys.implementation must have the required attributes and leave it at
that.  However, my preference is still for dotted access rather than a
dict.  The type doesn't really matter to me otherwise.  Immutability
isn't a big concern nor is sequence-ness.  I'll tone the type
discussion accordingly.

If anyone has strong feelings for item-access over attribute-access,
please elaborate.  I'm just not seeing it as that important and would
rather finish up the PEP as simply as possible.

-eric


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list