[Python-Dev] Status of 3.2 in Hg repository?

Tim Peters tim.peters at gmail.com
Wed Aug 21 02:33:57 CEST 2013

[Tim, wondering why the 3.2 branch isn't "inactive"]
>> ...
>> What is gained by _not_ merging here?  I don't see it.

[Antoine Pitrou]
> Perhaps Georg doesn't like merges? ;-)
> I suppose what's gained is "one less command to type".

So let's try a different question ;-)  Would anyone _object_ to
completing the process described in the docs:  merge 3.2 into 3.3,
then merge 3.3 into default?  I'd be happy to do that.  I'd throw away
all the merge changes except for adding the v3,2.5 tag to .hgtags.

The only active branches remaining would be `default` and 2.7, which
is what I expected when I started this ;-)

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list