[Python-Dev] please back out changeset f903cf864191 before alpha-2
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Sun Aug 25 02:55:40 CEST 2013
Eli Bendersky writes:
> I'm strongly opposed to reverting [the change to ElementTree]
> because it cleaned up messy code duplication and actually make the
> code size smaller. While I agree that the API of incremental parsing
> should be given another look, IncrementalParser can also be seen as
> an implementation detail of iterparse().
Except that its API is familiar and cleaner. Does any current
application depend on *not* doing whatever it is that the new API does
that IncrementalParser *does* do? If not, why not keep the API of
IncrementalParser and shim the new code in under that?
> Thus, it's probably OK to revert the documentation part of the
> commit to not mention IncrementalParser at all,
FWIW, as somebody who can recall using ET exactly one,
IncrementalParser is what I used.
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list