[Python-Dev] enum discussion: can someone please summarize open issues?
eliben at gmail.com
Fri May 3 16:14:46 CEST 2013
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz>wrote:
> Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> I still don't get it why this is an issue though, or at least why this is
>> different than any other getattr on any other class,
> It's not a problem that getattr() has this behaviour.
> What I'm questioning is the idea that getattr() should
> be the only provided way of doing a name->enum lookup,
> because that will require everyone to do extra checks
> to ensure safety.
I'm just curious what it is about enums that sets everyone on a "let's make
things safer" path. Python is about duck typing, it's absolutely "unsafe"
in the static typing sense, in the most fundamental ways imaginable. When
programmatically invoking a method on a class (say some sort of RPC), we
don't check that the class is of the correct type. We invoke a method, and
if it quacks, that's a good enough duck. If it was actually the wrong
class, something will break later. EAFP Is a central Python tenet, whether
we like it or not. If one looks for static guarantees, Python surely
shouldn't be the preferred language, no?
And concretely, how is this case different from any programmatic attribute
access in Python objects? You can pass dunders to getattr() and it probably
wasn't what you meant, but Python does not do this type checking for you.
Why is an Enum different than any other class?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-Dev