[Python-Dev] PEP 435: initial values must be specified? Yes

[Glenn Linderman]

On 5/6/2013 7:58 PM, Tim Delaney wrote:
> On 7 May 2013 12:29, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us 
> <mailto:ethan at stoneleaf.us>> wrote:
>
>     On 05/05/2013 02:55 PM, Tim Delaney wrote:
>
>
>         So long as I can get one of the requirements documented to
>         implement an auto-number syntax I'll be happy enough with
>         stdlib enums I think.
>
>         class Color(AutoIntEnum):
>              red = ...
>              green = ...
>              blue = ...
>
>
>     Will this do?
>
>         class AutoNumber(Enum):
>             def __new__(cls):
>                 value = len(cls.__enum_info__) + 1
>                 obj = object.__new__(cls)
>                 obj._value = value
>                 return obj
>             def __int__(self):
>                 return self._value
>         class Color(AutoNumber):
>             red = ()
>             green = ()
>             blue = ()
>
>
> Considering that doesn't actually work with the reference 
> implementation (AutoNumber.__new__ is never called) ... no.

Maybe you should have tried with the latest version of the reference 
implementation, where Ethan kindly fixed the reference implementation to 
work better with NamedInt (per my thread "ref impl disc 2") and 
apparently also with the above class's __new__...

>
> print(Color.red._value)
> print(int(Color.red))
>
> ---------- Run Python3 ----------
> ()
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "D:\home\repos\mercurial\ref435\ref435.py", line 292, in <module>
>     print(int(Color.red))
> TypeError: __int__ returned non-int (type tuple)
>
> Plus I would not want to use the empty tuple for the purpose - at 
> least ... implies something ongoing.

Why not? For classes derived from Enum, having __new__, the value/tuple 
assigned to the enumeration member becomes the set of parameters to 
__new__... so why would you want to provide a parameter?  Well, you 
could, with a minor tweak.  If you don't like Ethan's AutoNumber class, 
you can now write your own, like the following one that I derived from 
his, but to use your preferred ...

class AutoNumber(Enum):
     def __new__(cls, parm):
         obj = object.__new__(cls)
         if parm is ...:
            value = len(cls.__enum_info__) + 1
             obj._value = value
         else:
             obj._value = parm
         return obj
     def __int__(self):
         return self._value
class Color(AutoNumber):
     red = ...
     green = ...
     blue = 7
     purple = ...

print ( Color.red, repr( Color.red ))
print ( Color.green, repr( Color.green ))
print ( Color.blue, repr( Color.blue ))
print ( Color.purple, repr( Color.purple ))

Since you want to provide a parameter, I decided in my example 
AutoNumber class that I would use ... as a flag to use his count, and 
anything else would be an actual value for the enumeration member.  You 
could do whatever else you like, of course, should you write your own, 
including using someone's suggested itertools.count()
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130506/088b7f8b/attachment.html>