[Python-Dev] PEP 435 - ref impl disc 2

[Glenn Linderman]

On 5/14/2013 7:16 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> Thank you for being persistent.  You are correct, the value should be 
>> an IntET (at least, with a custom __new__ ;).
>
> You know, when you look at something you wrote the night before, and 
> have no idea what you were trying to say, you know you were tired.  
> Ignore my parenthetical remark.

Gladly. And we now have several more days to have forgotten what we were 
doing/talking about...

> Okay, the value is now an IntET, as expected and appropriate. 

Maybe.

I upgraded my ref435.py from yours at 
https://bitbucket.org/stoneleaf/ref435 (and your test file there 
references enum.py which is not there).

My demo1.py still doesn't work.  The first 4 lines are fine, but not the 
last two.  I still cannot do a lookup (via __call__ syntax) by either 
int or IntET value.

You have my old misnamed NEI class in your test file now, and the tests 
you use with it work... but you don't have a lookup test.  My demo1 
does, and that fails.

After instrumenting Enum.__new__ it seems that the member.value is still 
the constructor parameters...

Maybe I picked up the wrong version of your code?

Oh and demo1.py has leftover __new__ and __init__ definitions for NIE, 
modeled after your earlier suggestions. Leaving them in causes 
everything to be named 'temp'. Taking them out makes things not work 
differently.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130520/ce30ed9b/attachment.html>