[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19330: Handle the no-docstrings case in tests

Serhiy Storchaka storchaka at gmail.com
Sat Oct 26 20:15:07 CEST 2013


26.10.13 20:32, Nick Coghlan написав(ла):
> On 27 October 2013 01:10, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 26.10.13 15:50, Stefan Krah написав(ла):
>>
>>> nick.coghlan <python-checkins at python.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a9bbc2d0c1dc
>>>> -HAVE_DOCSTRINGS = (check_impl_detail(cpython=False) or
>>>> -                   sys.platform == 'win32' or
>>>> -                   sysconfig.get_config_var('WITH_DOC_STRINGS'))
>>>> +# Rather than trying to enumerate all the cases where docstrings may be
>>>> +# disabled, we just check for that directly
>>>> +
>>>> +def _check_docstrings():
>>>> +    """Just used to check if docstrings are enabled"""
>>>> +
>>>> +HAVE_DOCSTRINGS = (_check_docstrings.__doc__ is not None)
>>>>
>>>>    requires_docstrings = unittest.skipUnless(HAVE_DOCSTRINGS,
>>>
>>>
>>> I think that does not detect --without-doc-strings (i.e. the C docstrings
>>> are
>>> empty).
>>
>>
>> Indeed. HAVE_DOCSTRINGS was introduced to skip tests for the C docstrings.
>> Python docstrings tests are skipped if sys.flags.optimize >= 2.
>
> That's *extraordinarily* confusing, especially when Serhiy suggested I
> use the flag when testing a pure Python module.

I'm sorry for misleading you.




More information about the Python-Dev mailing list