[Python-Dev] Use an empty def as a lambda
R. David Murray
rdmurray at bitdance.com
Sat Sep 21 21:00:39 CEST 2013
On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 12:55:20 -0500, Ryan <rymg19 at gmail.com> wrote:
> "Westley MartÃnez" <anikom15 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >'def' is no more ambiguous than 'lambda', and is in fact more
> >for 'def' doesn't lend itself to anything other than the word define,
> >whilst 'lambda' can only mean lambda function. Calling def explicit is
> >silly. It only makes sense because def arbitrarily means a function in
> >Python (I'm proposing def become func or proc in Python 4000).
> Change def to func? That's the worst idea I've heard yet. Def is
> already there; why break all existing code just for a word?
Note that whatever happens with Python4, breaking of backward
compatibility (by anything other than the deletion of cruft) is very
unlikely to be part of it.
More information about the Python-Dev