[Python-Dev] Getting Tulip (PEP 3156) into the 3.4 stdlib, marked provisional, named asyncio

Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Sat Sep 28 12:55:21 CEST 2013

On Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:59:05 +1000
Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> It sounds like a reasonable approach to me.
> In terms of naming, would you consider "concurrent.asyncio"? When we
> created that parent namespace for futures, one of the other suggested
> submodules discussed was the standard event loop API.

-10. Please, let's stop it.



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list