[Python-Dev] Why not support user defined operator overloading ?
Steven D'Aprano
steve at pearwood.info
Sun Sep 29 17:33:38 CEST 2013
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 08:51:37PM +0800, 张佩佩 wrote:
> Hello:
> As far as I know, there is not a language support user defined operator overloading.
> Python3 can overloading belowed operators.
[...]
> (Do I miss something ?)
Yes, many.
http://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#special-method-names
http://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#emulating-numeric-types
> If we can overloading these operators, why we can't overloading other operators?
> (like .* often used in matrix, U in set operation)
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0211/
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0225/
There is a good argument for being able to overload element-wise and
object-wise operators. However, I don't think it is good to be able to
create arbitrary new operators, e.g. a X b for an X operator. We
already have syntax for arbitrary functions, and they aren't limited to
binary operators: X(a, b, c, d, ...) works better than a X b for most
uses.
--
Steven
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list