[Python-Dev] Language Summit notes

Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Thu Apr 10 23:20:36 CEST 2014


On Apr 10, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:

>There's absolutely no reason to exempt CFFI, IMHO. On the contrary -- the
>dependence on other 3rd party modules (PLY and pycparesr), and the related
>dilemma of whether to expose each/both as stdlib modules or hide as
>internal implementation details -- makes a PEP even more important here.

Agreed.  We've already started down the slippery slope of bundling third party
packages (e.g. the ensurepip dependencies) and this is causing headaches for
some of us distro guys.  Either they're in the stdlib or their not.

-Barry


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list