[Python-Dev] PEP 469: Restoring the iterkeys/values/items() methods
Benjamin Peterson
benjamin at python.org
Sat Apr 19 18:33:27 CEST 2014
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014, at 9:30, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Guido van Rossum writes:
>
> > Does everyone involved know that "for x in d.iterkeys()" is
> > equivalent to "for x in d" and works the same in Python 2 and 3?
> [...]
>
> > This doesn't solve itervalues() and iteritems() but I expect those
> > are less common, and "for x, y in d.iteritems(): <blah>" is
> > rewritten nicely as
> >
> > for x in d:
> > y = d[x]
> > <blah>
>
> I suppose there's no way to get the compiler to both make "for x in d"
> work as above, and make "for k, v in d" be equivalent to Python 2's
> "for k, v in d.iteritems()"? It seems totally analogous to getting
> both "for x in list" and "for x, y in list_of_couples" to DTRT. (To
> me, anyway.)
That doesn't make sense. What if your keys are tuples?
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list