[Python-Dev] Commit-ready patches needing review
Nikolaus Rath
Nikolaus at rath.org
Sun Apr 27 21:10:46 CEST 2014
Hello,
While my last appeal resulted in quite some commits (thanks!), I still
have some more commit-ready patches waiting for review. It'd be great
if some people could find time to take a look:
* http://bugs.python.org/issue1738 (filecmp.dircmp does exact match
only)
* http://bugs.python.org/issue20951 (SSLSocket.send() returns 0 for
non-blocking socket)
In this case someone just needs to decide if we want to (a) document
the current behavior, (b) deprecate the current behavior or (c) change
the current behavior. I have attached patches for (a) and (b), and if
(c) is the desired route I'll be happy to create a patch on short
notice.
* http://bugs.python.org/issue20177 (Derby #8: Convert 28 sites to
Argument Clinic across 2 files)
* http://bugs.python.org/issue19414 (iter(ordered_dict) yields keys
not in dict in some circumstances)
* http://bugs.python.org/issue15955 (gzip, bz2, lzma: add option to
limit output size)
Nadeem has kindly reviewed the first iteration of this patch, but the
second iteration has been waiting for attention for quite some time
now.
* http://bugs.python.org/issue20578 (BufferedIOBase.readinto1 is
missing)
* http://bugs.python.org/issue21057 (TextIOWrapper does not support
reading bytearrays or memoryviews)
Best,
Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list