[Python-Dev] Commit-ready patches needing review
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Sun Apr 27 21:35:38 CEST 2014
Agreed.
On Sunday, April 27, 2014, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 12:10:46 -0700
> Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus at rath.org <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > * http://bugs.python.org/issue20951 (SSLSocket.send() returns 0 for
> > non-blocking socket)
> >
> > In this case someone just needs to decide if we want to (a) document
> > the current behavior, (b) deprecate the current behavior or (c) change
> > the current behavior. I have attached patches for (a) and (b), and if
> > (c) is the desired route I'll be happy to create a patch on short
> > notice.
>
> In this case I'd be inclined to follow Ben Darnell's advice and change
> the current behaviour (i.e., let the exception bubble up rather than
> catch it). This is what your initial patch does. However, it would need
> a documentation addition to explain the change (and perhaps a test,
> though that doesn't seem terribly necessary here).
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
--
--Guido van Rossum (on iPad)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140427/29b1ba9d/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list