[Python-Dev] libffi embedded in CPython
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Dec 19 15:04:03 CET 2014
On 19 December 2014 at 23:01, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:52:26 +0000
> Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 19 December 2014 at 08:26, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > I would like to add that "not doing anything" is not a good strategy
> > > either, because you accumulate bugs that get fixed upstream (I'm
> > > pretty sure all the problems from cpython got fixed in upstream
> > > libffi, but not all libffi fixes made it to cpython).
> >
> > Probably the easiest way of moving this forward would be for someone
> > to identify the CPython-specific patches in the current version, and
> > check if they are addressed in the latest libffi version. They haven't
> > been applied as they are, I gather, but maybe equivalent fixes have
> > been made. I've no idea how easy that would be (presumably not
> > trivial, or someone would already have done it). If the patches aren't
> > needed any more, upgrading becomes a lot more plausible.
>
> Another strategy is to dump our private fork, link with upstream
> instead, and see what breaks.
> Presumably, our test suite should be able to catch some (most?) of that
> breakage.
>
And if we're going to do something like that for 3.5, now's the time, since
we still have a lot of lead time on the 3.5 release.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20141220/d80c9480/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list