[Python-Dev] RFC: PEP 460: Add bytes % args and bytes.format(args) to Python 3.5
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Jan 10 02:32:05 CET 2014
On 10 Jan 2014 03:32, "Antoine Pitrou" <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 05:26:04 +1000
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> > We should probably include format_map for consistency with the str API.
> Yes, you're right.
> > >However, I
> > > also added bytearray into the mix, as bytearray objects should
> > > generally support the same operations as bytes (and they can be useful
> > > *especially* for network programming).
> > So we'd define the *format* string as mutable to get a mutable result
> > of the formatting operations? This seems a little weird to me.
> > It also seems weird for a format method on a mutable type to *not*
> > in-place mutation.
> It's consistent with bytearray.join's behaviour:
> >>> x = bytearray()
> >>> x.join([b"abc"])
> >>> x
Yeah, I guess I'm OK with us being consistent on that one. It's still
weird, but also clearly useful :)
Will the new binary format ever call __format__? I assume not, but it's
probably best to make that absolutely explicit in the PEP.
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-Dev