[Python-Dev] PEP 3121, 384 Refactoring Issues
Alexander Belopolsky
alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com
Fri Jul 11 01:57:39 CEST 2014
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
> I'm just curious as to why there are 54 open issues after both of these
> PEPs have been accepted and 384 is listed as finished. Did we hit some
> unforeseen technical problem which stalled development?
I tried to bring some sanity to that effort by opening a "meta issue":
http://bugs.python.org/issue15787
My enthusiasm, however, vanished after I reviewed the refactoring for the
datetime module:
http://bugs.python.org/issue15390
My main objections are to following PEP 384
<http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/> (Stable ABI) within stdlib
modules. I see little benefit for the stdlib (which is shipped fresh with
every new version of Python) from following those guidelines.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140710/c6f03c27/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list