[Python-Dev] Python 2.7 patch levels turning two digit
Ethan Furman
ethan at stoneleaf.us
Mon Jun 23 23:19:13 CEST 2014
On 06/21/2014 02:48 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 06/21/2014 02:37 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>
>> My answers to these are: 1. We should use dynamic linking
>> instead and not let OpenSSL bugs trigger Python releases; 2.
>> It's not a big problem; 3. Yes, please, since it is difficult
>> for people to develop and debug their extensions with a
>> 2008 compiler, when the rest of the world has long moved on.
>
> +1 (assuming not incredibly difficult and those that can are willing ;)
Revising this to:
+1, -0, -1
It seems to me the intention of supporting 2.7 for so long was not to give ourselves additional nightmares, but to
provide a basic level of support for those who are needing longer time before migrating. One of the reasons to migrate
is to avoid future pain (pain is an excellent motivator -- it's why we don't go to the doctor when we're healthy, right?
;) If getting new or updated modules becomes more painful then that's motivation to upgrade -- not motivation for us to
make both our lives (with the extra work) and everyone's else lives (why isn't this module working? oh, wrong compiler)
more difficult.
--
~Ethan~
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list