[Python-Dev] Python 4: don't remove anything, don't break backward compatibility

Ryan Gonzalez rymg19 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 10 19:17:30 CET 2014


You forgot 3., and 3.$.


On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:04:08 +0100
> > "Stefan Richthofer" <Stefan.Richthofer at gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >> > Guido famously hates two digit minor version numbers. :)
> >>
> >> This is no problem either. Simply switch to hexadecimal numbering ;)
> >
> > Or wrap around to negative numbers (a minus sign isn't technically a
> > digit, is it?).
>
> Terrible idea. Would wreak havoc with comparisons. No. Python 3 is all
> about Unicode, so the right way to proceed is 3.8, 3.9, 3.:, 3.;, 3.<,
> 3.=, 3.>, 3.?, 3.@, 3.A.
>
> ChrisA
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/rymg19%40gmail.com
>



-- 
Ryan
If anybody ever asks me why I prefer C++ to C, my answer will be simple:
"It's becauseslejfp23(@#Q*(E*EIdc-SEGFAULT. Wait, I don't think that was
nul-terminated."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140310/e53c8d2f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list