[Python-Dev] Sad status of Python 3.x buildbots
jcea at jcea.es
Fri Oct 10 17:45:50 CEST 2014
On 03/09/14 02:37, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I'm not sure that's an answer to the problem. What we need is not more
> machines, but dedicated buildbot maintainers.
I would love to get an email if my buildbots are consistently RED for a
In the past Antoine, Victor and others pinged me about issues in my
buildbots (OpenIndiana). I feel shame and I think it is not very
If red state in the buildbots were really trustable, the committer of
that changelog should be bugged too. Since we have quite a few false
positives, that would be probably annoying and no productive. Decreasing
false positives should be a priority.
In my case another issue is that my buildbots are hosted as a Solaris
ZONE inside a OpenIndiana development machine I don't manage. Their own
usage varies and can impact buildbots resource limits like memory, swap
Thanks for your patience and for notifying me issues when you suffer them.
Jesús Cea Avión _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
Twitter: @jcea _/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"Things are not so easy" _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump" _/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Python-Dev