[Python-Dev] provisional status for asyncio

Yury Selivanov yselivanov.ml at gmail.com
Fri Aug 28 00:47:28 CEST 2015

On 2015-08-27 6:44 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Maybe asyncio should just be kept provisional during 3.5, with a 
> separate promise to remain backward compatible?

I'm +1.

I'm also certain that by 3.6.0 we will stabilize asyncio to the point we 
can freeze it like any other stdlib module.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list