[Python-Dev] PEP 448 review

[Nick Coghlan]

On 17 March 2015 at 23:49, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:11 PM Neil Girdhar <mistersheik at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I was wondering what is left with the PEP 448
>> (http://bugs.python.org/issue2292) code review?  Big thanks to Benjamin,
>> Ethan, and Serhiy for reviewing some (all?) of the code.  What is the next
>> step of this process?
>
>
> My suspicion is that if no one steps up between now and PyCon to do a
> complete code review of the final patch, we as a group will try to get it
> done at the PyCon sprints. I have made the issue a release blocker to help
> make sure it gets reviewed and doesn't accidentally get left behind.

Good idea - I just bumped the PEP 479 issue
(http://bugs.python.org/issue22906) similarly, as well as giving it an
initial review (Neil had already noted it needed tests for the new
behaviour, and the language reference doc updates look surprisingly
minimal to me).

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia