[Python-Dev] Challenge: Please break this! (a.k.a restricted mode revisited)
jon+python-dev at unequivocal.co.uk
Tue Apr 12 10:03:47 EDT 2016
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:40:57PM +0000, David Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:12:27PM +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > I can think of one possible threat. Suppose that the locale library
> > has a bug, so that calling "aardvark".isdigit seg faults, potentially
> > executing arbitrary C code, but at the very least crashing the
> > application. Is that the sort of attack you're concerned by?
> This thread already covered the need to address SEGV at length. For a
> truly evil user, almost any kind of crash is an opportunity to take
> control of the system, and a security solution ignoring this is no
> security solution at all.
> But that's not what's happening, instead a dead horse is being flogged
> over a hundred messages in our inboxes and IMHO it is excruciating to
I don't think that is true at all, and I personally I have found this
thread very interesting. I apologise if others have not.
> > Even if the only thing we learn from Jon's experiment is a new set of
> > tricks for breaking out of the sandbox, that's still interesting, if
> > not useful.
> Don't forget the worst case: a fundamentally broken security module
> heavily marketed to the naive using claims the core team couldn't break
I should point out that my module is called "unsafe.py", is titled
an "experiment", and prominently states in the README:
Do not use this code for any purpose in the real world.
I will not be putting it up as an installable package, and as already
stated it was never my intention to suggest that it or anything like
it be included in the stdlib. I will however leave it on github for
anyone who wants to have a go at breaking into it in the future.
More information about the Python-Dev