[Python-Dev] Most 3.x buildbots are green again, please don't break them and watch them!
victor.stinner at gmail.com
Thu Apr 14 06:25:40 EDT 2016
Le 14 avr. 2016 11:16 AM, "Serhiy Storchaka" <storchaka at gmail.com> a écrit :
> A desirable but nonexistent feature is to write emails to authors of
commits that broke buildbots. How hard to implement this?
Yeah I also had this idea since many years but buildbots were quite
unstable. Maybe we should be more strict to consider a buildbot as stable?
I propose to experiment sending notifications of failure to the authors of
changes *and* to a new mailing list. I would subscribe to such list. An
even safer starting point would be to only start with the mailing list.
FYI I'm connected to the #python-dev IRC channel which already contain
these notifications. But I agree that mails are better.
> What are you think about backporting recent regrtest to 2.7? Most needed
features to me are the -m and -G options.
Regrtest changed a lot in python 3.6 (new test.libregrtest library).
I suggest to start from python 3.5.
For -m: if it doesn't need to modify the unittest module, I agree.
I don't know -G option.
> Would be nice to add a feature for running every test in separate
subprocess. This will isolate the effect of failed tests.
See my email :-) I proposed to modify -j1 to run tests in subrpocesses. I
even mentionned my issue.
I suggest to use -jN on all buildbot, at least -j1.
Maybe -j2 is even better since many tests are waiting on IO or simple sleep.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-Dev