[Python-Dev] PEP 525
Yury Selivanov
yselivanov.ml at gmail.com
Tue Aug 23 11:56:25 EDT 2016
Hi,
I think it's time to discuss PEP 525 on python-dev (pasted below).
There were no changes in the PEP since I posted it to python-ideas
a couple of weeks ago.
One really critical thing that will block PEP acceptance is
asynchronous generators (AG) finalization. The problem is
to provide a reliable way to correctly close all AGs on program
shutdown.
To recap: PEP 492 requires an event loop or a coroutine runner
to run coroutines. PEP 525 defines AGs using asynchronous
iteration protocol, also defined in PEP 492. AGs require an
'async for' statement to iterate over them, which in turn can
only be used in a coroutine. Therefore, AGs also require an
event loop or a coroutine runner to operate.
The finalization problem is related to partial iteration.
For instance, let's look at an ordinary synchronous generator:
def gen():
try:
while True:
yield 42
finally:
print("done")
g = gen()
next(g)
next(g)
del g
In the above example, when 'g' is GCed, the interpreter will
try to close the generator. It will do that by throwing a
GeneratorExit exception into 'g', which would trigger the 'finally'
statement.
For AGs we have a similar problem. Except that they can have
`await` expressions in their `finally` statements, which means
that the interpreter can't close them on its own. An event
loop is required to run an AG, and an event loop is required to
close it correctly.
To enable correct AGs finalization, PEP 525 proposes to add a
`sys.set_asyncgen_finalizer` API. The idea is to have a finalizer
callback assigned to each AG, and when it's time to close the AG,
that callback will be called. The callback will be installed by
the event loop (or coroutine runner), and should schedule a
correct asynchronous finalization of the AG (remember, AGs can
have 'await' expressions in their finally statements).
The problem with 'set_asyncgen_finalizer' is that the event loop
doesn't know about AGs until they are GCed. This can be a problem
if we want to write a program that gracefully closes all AGs
when the event loop is being closed.
There is an alternative approach to finalization of AGs: instead
of assigning a finalizer callback to an AG, we can add an API to
intercept AG first iteration. That would allow event loops to
have weak references to all AGs running under their control:
1. that would make it possible to intercept AGs garbage collection
similarly to the currently proposed set_asyncgen_finalizer
2. it would also allow us to implement 'loop.shutdown' coroutine,
which would try to asynchronously close all open AGs.
The second approach gives event loops more control and allows to
implement APIs to collect open resources gracefully. The only
downside is that it's a bit harder for event loops to work with.
Let's discuss.
PEP: 525
Title: Asynchronous Generators
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Yury Selivanov <yury at magic.io>
Discussions-To: <python-dev at python.org>
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 28-Jul-2016
Python-Version: 3.6
Post-History: 02-Aug-2016
Abstract
========
PEP 492 introduced support for native coroutines and ``async``/``await``
syntax to Python 3.5. It is proposed here to extend Python's
asynchronous capabilities by adding support for
*asynchronous generators*.
Rationale and Goals
===================
Regular generators (introduced in PEP 255) enabled an elegant way of
writing complex *data producers* and have them behave like an iterator.
However, currently there is no equivalent concept for the *asynchronous
iteration protocol* (``async for``). This makes writing asynchronous
data producers unnecessarily complex, as one must define a class that
implements ``__aiter__`` and ``__anext__`` to be able to use it in
an ``async for`` statement.
Essentially, the goals and rationale for PEP 255, applied to the
asynchronous execution case, hold true for this proposal as well.
Performance is an additional point for this proposal: in our testing of
the reference implementation, asynchronous generators are **2x** faster
than an equivalent implemented as an asynchronous iterator.
As an illustration of the code quality improvement, consider the
following class that prints numbers with a given delay once iterated::
class Ticker:
"""Yield numbers from 0 to `to` every `delay` seconds."""
def __init__(self, delay, to):
self.delay = delay
self.i = 0
self.to = to
def __aiter__(self):
return self
async def __anext__(self):
i = self.i
if i >= self.to:
raise StopAsyncIteration
self.i += 1
if i:
await asyncio.sleep(self.delay)
return i
The same can be implemented as a much simpler asynchronous generator::
async def ticker(delay, to):
"""Yield numbers from 0 to `to` every `delay` seconds."""
for i in range(to):
yield i
await asyncio.sleep(delay)
Specification
=============
This proposal introduces the concept of *asynchronous generators* to
Python.
This specification presumes knowledge of the implementation of
generators and coroutines in Python (PEP 342, PEP 380 and PEP 492).
Asynchronous Generators
-----------------------
A Python *generator* is any function containing one or more ``yield``
expressions::
def func(): # a function
return
def genfunc(): # a generator function
yield
We propose to use the same approach to define
*asynchronous generators*::
async def coro(): # a coroutine function
await smth()
async def asyncgen(): # an asynchronous generator function
await smth()
yield 42
The result of calling an *asynchronous generator function* is
an *asynchronous generator object*, which implements the asynchronous
iteration protocol defined in PEP 492.
It is a ``SyntaxError`` to have a non-empty ``return`` statement in an
asynchronous generator.
Support for Asynchronous Iteration Protocol
-------------------------------------------
The protocol requires two special methods to be implemented:
1. An ``__aiter__`` method returning an *asynchronous iterator*.
2. An ``__anext__`` method returning an *awaitable* object, which uses
``StopIteration`` exception to "yield" values, and
``StopAsyncIteration`` exception to signal the end of the iteration.
Asynchronous generators define both of these methods. Let's manually
iterate over a simple asynchronous generator::
async def genfunc():
yield 1
yield 2
gen = genfunc()
assert gen.__aiter__() is gen
assert await gen.__anext__() == 1
assert await gen.__anext__() == 2
await gen.__anext__() # This line will raise StopAsyncIteration.
Finalization
------------
PEP 492 requires an event loop or a scheduler to run coroutines.
Because asynchronous generators are meant to be used from coroutines,
they also require an event loop to run and finalize them.
Asynchronous generators can have ``try..finally`` blocks, as well as
``async with``. It is important to provide a guarantee that, even
when partially iterated, and then garbage collected, generators can
be safely finalized. For example::
async def square_series(con, to):
async with con.transaction():
cursor = con.cursor(
'SELECT generate_series(0, $1) AS i', to)
async for row in cursor:
yield row['i'] ** 2
async for i in square_series(con, 1000):
if i == 100:
break
The above code defines an asynchronous generator that uses
``async with`` to iterate over a database cursor in a transaction.
The generator is then iterated over with ``async for``, which interrupts
the iteration at some point.
The ``square_series()`` generator will then be garbage collected,
and without a mechanism to asynchronously close the generator, Python
interpreter would not be able to do anything.
To solve this problem we propose to do the following:
1. Implement an ``aclose`` method on asynchronous generators
returning a special *awaitable*. When awaited it
throws a ``GeneratorExit`` into the suspended generator and
iterates over it until either a ``GeneratorExit`` or
a ``StopAsyncIteration`` occur.
This is very similar to what the ``close()`` method does to regular
Python generators, except that an event loop is required to execute
``aclose()``.
2. Raise a ``RuntimeError``, when an asynchronous generator executes
a ``yield`` expression in its ``finally`` block (using ``await``
is fine, though)::
async def gen():
try:
yield
finally:
await asyncio.sleep(1) # Can use 'await'.
yield # Cannot use 'yield',
# this line will trigger a
# RuntimeError.
3. Add two new methods to the ``sys`` module:
``set_asyncgen_finalizer()`` and ``get_asyncgen_finalizer()``.
The idea behind ``sys.set_asyncgen_finalizer()`` is to allow event
loops to handle generators finalization, so that the end user
does not need to care about the finalization problem, and it just
works.
When an asynchronous generator is iterated for the first time,
it stores a reference to the current finalizer. If there is none,
a ``RuntimeError`` is raised. This provides a strong guarantee that
every asynchronous generator object will always have a finalizer
installed by the correct event loop.
When an asynchronous generator is about to be garbage collected,
it calls its cached finalizer. The assumption is that the finalizer
will schedule an ``aclose()`` call with the loop that was active
when the iteration started.
For instance, here is how asyncio is modified to allow safe
finalization of asynchronous generators::
# asyncio/base_events.py
class BaseEventLoop:
def run_forever(self):
...
old_finalizer = sys.get_asyncgen_finalizer()
sys.set_asyncgen_finalizer(self._finalize_asyncgen)
try:
...
finally:
sys.set_asyncgen_finalizer(old_finalizer)
...
def _finalize_asyncgen(self, gen):
self.create_task(gen.aclose())
``sys.set_asyncgen_finalizer()`` is thread-specific, so several event
loops running in parallel threads can use it safely.
Asynchronous Generator Object
-----------------------------
The object is modeled after the standard Python generator object.
Essentially, the behaviour of asynchronous generators is designed
to replicate the behaviour of synchronous generators, with the only
difference in that the API is asynchronous.
The following methods and properties are defined:
1. ``agen.__aiter__()``: Returns ``agen``.
2. ``agen.__anext__()``: Returns an *awaitable*, that performs one
asynchronous generator iteration when awaited.
3. ``agen.asend(val)``: Returns an *awaitable*, that pushes the
``val`` object in the ``agen`` generator. When the ``agen`` has
not yet been iterated, ``val`` must be ``None``.
Example::
async def gen():
await asyncio.sleep(0.1)
v = yield 42
print(v)
await asyncio.sleep(0.2)
g = gen()
await g.asend(None) # Will return 42 after sleeping
# for 0.1 seconds.
await g.asend('hello') # Will print 'hello' and
# raise StopAsyncIteration
# (after sleeping for 0.2 seconds.)
4. ``agen.athrow(typ, [val, [tb]])``: Returns an *awaitable*, that
throws an exception into the ``agen`` generator.
Example::
async def gen():
try:
await asyncio.sleep(0.1)
yield 'hello'
except ZeroDivisionError:
await asyncio.sleep(0.2)
yield 'world'
g = gen()
v = await g.asend(None)
print(v) # Will print 'hello' after
# sleeping for 0.1 seconds.
v = await g.athrow(ZeroDivisionError)
print(v) # Will print 'world' after
$ sleeping 0.2 seconds.
5. ``agen.aclose()``: Returns an *awaitable*, that throws a
``GeneratorExit`` exception into the generator. The *awaitable* can
either return a yielded value, if ``agen`` handled the exception,
or ``agen`` will be closed and the exception will propagate back
to the caller.
6. ``agen.__name__`` and ``agen.__qualname__``: readable and writable
name and qualified name attributes.
7. ``agen.ag_await``: The object that ``agen`` is currently *awaiting*
on, or ``None``. This is similar to the currently available
``gi_yieldfrom`` for generators and ``cr_await`` for coroutines.
8. ``agen.ag_frame``, ``agen.ag_running``, and ``agen.ag_code``:
defined in the same way as similar attributes of standard generators.
``StopIteration`` and ``StopAsyncIteration`` are not propagated out of
asynchronous generators, and are replaced with a ``RuntimeError``.
Implementation Details
----------------------
Asynchronous generator object (``PyAsyncGenObject``) shares the
struct layout with ``PyGenObject``. In addition to that, the
reference implementation introduces three new objects:
1. ``PyAsyncGenASend``: the awaitable object that implements
``__anext__`` and ``asend()`` methods.
2. ``PyAsyncGenAThrow``: the awaitable object that implements
``athrow()`` and ``aclose()`` methods.
3. ``_PyAsyncGenWrappedValue``: every directly yielded object from an
asynchronous generator is implicitly boxed into this structure. This
is how the generator implementation can separate objects that are
yielded using regular iteration protocol from objects that are
yielded using asynchronous iteration protocol.
``PyAsyncGenASend`` and ``PyAsyncGenAThrow`` are awaitables (they have
``__await__`` methods returning ``self``) and are coroutine-like objects
(implementing ``__iter__``, ``__next__``, ``send()`` and ``throw()``
methods). Essentially, they control how asynchronous generators are
iterated:
.. image:: pep-0525-1.png
:align: center
:width: 80%
PyAsyncGenASend and PyAsyncGenAThrow
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
``PyAsyncGenASend`` is a coroutine-like object that drives ``__anext__``
and ``asend()`` methods and implements the asynchronous iteration
protocol.
``agen.asend(val)`` and ``agen.__anext__()`` return instances of
``PyAsyncGenASend`` (which hold references back to the parent
``agen`` object.)
The data flow is defined as follows:
1. When ``PyAsyncGenASend.send(val)`` is called for the first time,
``val`` is pushed to the parent ``agen`` object (using existing
facilities of ``PyGenObject``.)
Subsequent iterations over the ``PyAsyncGenASend`` objects, push
``None`` to ``agen``.
When a ``_PyAsyncGenWrappedValue`` object is yielded, it
is unboxed, and a ``StopIteration`` exception is raised with the
unwrapped value as an argument.
2. When ``PyAsyncGenASend.throw(*exc)`` is called for the first time,
``*exc`` is throwed into the parent ``agen`` object.
Subsequent iterations over the ``PyAsyncGenASend`` objects, push
``None`` to ``agen``.
When a ``_PyAsyncGenWrappedValue`` object is yielded, it
is unboxed, and a ``StopIteration`` exception is raised with the
unwrapped value as an argument.
3. ``return`` statements in asynchronous generators raise
``StopAsyncIteration`` exception, which is propagated through
``PyAsyncGenASend.send()`` and ``PyAsyncGenASend.throw()`` methods.
``PyAsyncGenAThrow`` is very similar to ``PyAsyncGenASend``. The only
difference is that ``PyAsyncGenAThrow.send()``, when called first time,
throws an exception into the parent ``agen`` object (instead of pushing
a value into it.)
New Standard Library Functions and Types
----------------------------------------
1. ``types.AsyncGeneratorType`` -- type of asynchronous generator
object.
2. ``sys.set_asyncgen_finalizer()`` and ``sys.get_asyncgen_finalizer()``
methods to set up asynchronous generators finalizers in event loops.
3. ``inspect.isasyncgen()`` and ``inspect.isasyncgenfunction()``
introspection functions.
Backwards Compatibility
-----------------------
The proposal is fully backwards compatible.
In Python 3.5 it is a ``SyntaxError`` to define an ``async def``
function with a ``yield`` expression inside, therefore it's safe to
introduce asynchronous generators in 3.6.
Performance
===========
Regular Generators
------------------
There is no performance degradation for regular generators.
The following micro benchmark runs at the same speed on CPython with
and without asynchronous generators::
def gen():
i = 0
while i < 100000000:
yield i
i += 1
list(gen())
Improvements over asynchronous iterators
----------------------------------------
The following micro-benchmark shows that asynchronous generators
are about **2.3x faster** than asynchronous iterators implemented in
pure Python::
N = 10 ** 7
async def agen():
for i in range(N):
yield i
class AIter:
def __init__(self):
self.i = 0
def __aiter__(self):
return self
async def __anext__(self):
i = self.i
if i >= N:
raise StopAsyncIteration
self.i += 1
return i
Design Considerations
=====================
``aiter()`` and ``anext()`` builtins
------------------------------------
Originally, PEP 492 defined ``__aiter__`` as a method that should
return an *awaitable* object, resulting in an asynchronous iterator.
However, in CPython 3.5.2, ``__aiter__`` was redefined to return
asynchronous iterators directly. To avoid breaking backwards
compatibility, it was decided that Python 3.6 will support both
ways: ``__aiter__`` can still return an *awaitable* with
a ``DeprecationWarning`` being issued.
Because of this dual nature of ``__aiter__`` in Python 3.6, we cannot
add a synchronous implementation of ``aiter()`` built-in. Therefore,
it is proposed to wait until Python 3.7.
Asynchronous list/dict/set comprehensions
-----------------------------------------
Syntax for asynchronous comprehensions is unrelated to the asynchronous
generators machinery, and should be considered in a separate PEP.
Asynchronous ``yield from``
---------------------------
While it is theoretically possible to implement ``yield from`` support
for asynchronous generators, it would require a serious redesign of the
generators implementation.
``yield from`` is also less critical for asynchronous generators, since
there is no need provide a mechanism of implementing another coroutines
protocol on top of coroutines. And to compose asynchronous generators a
simple ``async for`` loop can be used::
async def g1():
yield 1
yield 2
async def g2():
async for v in g1():
yield v
Why the ``asend()`` and ``athrow()`` methods are necessary
----------------------------------------------------------
They make it possible to implement concepts similar to
``contextlib.contextmanager`` using asynchronous generators.
For instance, with the proposed design, it is possible to implement
the following pattern::
@async_context_manager
async def ctx():
await open()
try:
yield
finally:
await close()
async with ctx():
await ...
Another reason is that it is possible to push data and throw exceptions
into asynchronous generators using the object returned from
``__anext__`` object, but it is hard to do that correctly. Adding
explicit ``asend()`` and ``athrow()`` will pave a safe way to
accomplish that.
In terms of implementation, ``asend()`` is a slightly more generic
version of ``__anext__``, and ``athrow()`` is very similar to
``aclose()``. Therefore having these methods defined for asynchronous
generators does not add any extra complexity.
Example
=======
A working example with the current reference implementation (will
print numbers from 0 to 9 with one second delay)::
async def ticker(delay, to):
for i in range(to):
yield i
await asyncio.sleep(delay)
async def run():
async for i in ticker(1, 10):
print(i)
import asyncio
loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
try:
loop.run_until_complete(run())
finally:
loop.close()
Implementation
==============
The complete reference implementation is available at [1]_.
References
==========
.. [1] https://github.com/1st1/cpython/tree/async_gen
Copyright
=========
This document has been placed in the public domain.
..
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
sentence-end-double-space: t
fill-column: 70
coding: utf-8
End:
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list