[Python-Dev] release cadence

Ethan Furman ethan at stoneleaf.us
Tue Jul 5 14:30:06 EDT 2016


On 07/05/2016 10:44 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 04, 2016, at 10:31 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:

>> While we liked the "consistent calendar cadence that is some multiple
>> of 6 months" idea, several of us thought 12 months was way too short
>> as it makes for too many entries in third party support matrices.
>
> 18 months for a major release cadence still seems right to me.  Downstreams
> and third-parties often have to go through *a lot* of work to ensure
> compatibility, and try as we might, every Python release breaks *something*.
> Major version releases trigger a huge cascade of other work for lots of other
> people, and I don't think shortening that would be for the overall community
> good.  It just feels like we'd always be playing catch up.

+1 from me as well.  Rapid major releases are just a huge headache.  The 
nice thing about a .6 or .7 minor release is that we get closer to no 
bugs with each one.

--
~Ethan~



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list