[Python-Dev] PEP487: Simpler customization of class creation

Neil Girdhar mistersheik at gmail.com
Tue Jul 19 02:41:32 EDT 2016

Yes, I see what you're saying.   However, I don't understand why
__init_subclass__ (defined on some class C) cannot be used to implement the
checks required by @abstractmethod instead of doing it in ABCMeta.  This
would prevent metaclass conflicts since you could use @abstractmethod with
any metaclass or no metaclass at all provided you inherit from C.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:21 AM Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 19 July 2016 at 09:26, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, I'm very excited about this!
> >
> > Will this mean no more metaclass conflicts if using @abstractmethod?
> ABCMeta and EnumMeta both create persistent behavioural differences
> rather than only influencing subtype definition, so they'll need to
> remain as custom metaclasses.
> What this PEP (especially in combination with PEP 520) is aimed at
> enabling is subclassing APIs designed more around the notion of
> "implicit class decoration" where a common base class or mixin can be
> adjusted to perform certain actions whenever a new subclass is
> defined, without changing the runtime behaviour of those subclasses.
> (For example: a mixin or base class may require that certain
> parameters be set as class attributes - this PEP will allow the base
> class to check for those and throw an error at definition time, rather
> than getting a potentially cryptic error when it attempts to use the
> missing attribute)
> Cheers,
> Nick.
> --
> Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160719/e31d59c8/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list