[Python-Dev] Can we use "designated initializer" widely in core modules?
Erik
python at lucidity.plus.com
Tue Jan 17 19:00:05 EST 2017
On 17/01/17 06:32, INADA Naoki wrote:
> With designated initializer, it becomes:
>
> 0, /* tp_free */
> + .tp_fastcall = (fastternaryfunc)attrgetter_call,
> };
>
> It's readable, and easy to review.
FWIW, I dislike mixing the two forms (because it still prevents the
structure layout changing - or introduces bugs if it does - though I
guess in Python's case that's not likely to happen).
PEP 7 doesn't mention anything about this and I doubt a wholesale
conversion effort to the C99 syntax would be desirable, but perhaps a
recommendation that if a new initializer is being added then the whole
expression should be changed to the C99 syntax is reasonable.
Regards, E.
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list