[Python-Dev] for...else
Koos Zevenhoven
k7hoven at gmail.com
Wed Jul 26 20:07:51 EDT 2017
On Jul 27, 2017 02:38, "MRAB" <python at mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
On 2017-07-26 23:55, Koos Zevenhoven wrote:
>
> IMO,
>
> for item in sequence:
> # block
> nobreak: # or perhaps `if not break:`
> # block
>
> would be clearer (if the syntax is necessary at all).
>
You couldn't have "if not break:" because that would look like the start of
an 'if' statement.
Do you mean as an implementation issue or for human readability?
"nobreak" would introduce a new keyword, but "not break" wouldn't.
Sure :)
-- Koos (mobile)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170727/2d39522b/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list