[Python-Dev] PEP 484 proposal: don't default to Optional if argument default is None
carl at oddbird.net
Tue May 9 14:03:05 EDT 2017
On 05/09/2017 10:28 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> There's a proposal to change one detail of PEP 484. It currently says:
> An optional type is also automatically assumed when the default value is
> |None|, for example::
> |def handle_employee(e: Employee = None): ... |
> This is equivalent to::
> |def handle_employee(e: Optional[Employee] = None) -> None: ... |
> Now that we've got some experience actually using Optional with mypy
> (originally mypy ignored Optional), we're beginning to think that this
> was a bad idea. There's more discussion at
> https://github.com/python/typing/issues/275 and an implementation of the
> change (using a command-line flag) in
> Thoughts? Some function declarations will become a bit more verbose, but
> we gain clarity (many users of annotations don't seem to be familiar
> with this feature) and consistency (since this rule doesn't apply to
> variable declarations and class attribute declarations).
I've been code-reviewing a lot of diffs adding type coverage over the
last few months, and implicit-Optional has been among the most common
points of confusion. So I favor this change.
It might be nice to have a less verbose syntax for Optional, but that
can be a separate discussion.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Python-Dev