[Python-Dev] PEP 565: Show DeprecationWarning in __main__
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sun Nov 12 04:24:12 EST 2017
I've written a short(ish) PEP for the proposal to change the default
warnings filters to show DeprecationWarning in __main__:
The core proposal itself is just the idea in
https://bugs.python.org/issue31975 (i.e. adding
"default::DeprecationWarning:__main__" to the default filter set), but
the PEP fills in some details on the motivation for the original
change to the defaults, and why the current proposal is to add a new
filter for __main__, rather than dropping the default
DeprecationWarning filter entirely.
The PEP also proposes repurposing the existing FutureWarning category
to explicitly mean "backwards compatibility warnings that should be
shown to users of Python applications" since:
- we don't tend to use FutureWarning for its original nominal purpose
(changes that will continue to run but will do something different)
- FutureWarning was added in 2.3, so it's available in all still
supported versions of Python, and is shown by default in all of them
- it's at least arguably a less-jargony spelling of
DeprecationWarning, and hence more appropriate for displaying to end
users that may not have encountered the specific notion of "API
Title: Show DeprecationWarning in __main__
Author: Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>
Type: Standards Track
In Python 2.7 and Python 3.2, the default warning filters were updated to hide
DeprecationWarning by default, such that deprecation warnings in development
tools that were themselves written in Python (e.g. linters, static analysers,
test runners, code generators) wouldn't be visible to their users unless they
explicitly opted in to seeing them.
However, this change has had the unfortunate side effect of making
DeprecationWarning markedly less effective at its primary intended purpose:
providing advance notice of breaking changes in APIs (whether in CPython, the
standard library, or in third party libraries) to users of those APIs.
To improve this situation, this PEP proposes a single adjustment to the
default warnings filter: displaying deprecation warnings attributed to the main
module by default.
This change will mean that code entered at the interactive prompt and code in
single file scripts will revert to reporting these warnings by default, while
they will continue to be silenced by default for packaged code distributed as
part of an importable module.
The PEP also proposes a number of small adjustments to the reference
interpreter and standard library documentation to help make the warnings
subsystem more approachable for new Python developers.
The current set of default warnings filters consists of::
The default ``unittest`` test runner then uses ``warnings.catch_warnings()``
``warnings.simplefilter('default')`` to override the default filters while
running test cases.
The change proposed in this PEP is to update the default warning filter list
This means that in cases where the nominal location of the warning (as
determined by the ``stacklevel`` parameter to ``warnings.warn``) is in the
``__main__`` module, the first occurrence of each DeprecationWarning will once
again be reported.
This change will lead to DeprecationWarning being displayed by default for:
* code executed directly at the interactive prompt
* code executed directly as part of a single-file script
While continuing to be hidden by default for:
* code imported from another module in a ``zipapp`` archive's ``__main__.py``
* code imported from another module in an executable package's ``__main__``
* code imported from an executable script wrapper generated at installation time
based on a ``console_scripts`` or ``gui_scripts`` entry point definition
As a result, API deprecation warnings encountered by development tools written
in Python should continue to be hidden by default for users of those tools
While not its originally intended purpose, the standard library documentation
will also be updated to explicitly recommend the use of
than ``DeprecationWarning``) for backwards compatibility warnings that are
intended to be seen by *users* of an application.
This will give the following three distinct categories of backwards
compatibility warning, with three different intended audiences:
* ``PendingDeprecationWarning``: reported by default only in test runners that
override the default set of warning filters. The intended audience is Python
developers that take an active interest in ensuring the future compatibility
of their software (e.g. professional Python application developers with
specific support obligations).
* ``DeprecationWarning``: reported by default for code that runs directly in
the ``__main__`` module (as such code is considered relatively unlikely to
have a dedicated test suite), but relies on test suite based reporting for
code in other modules. The intended audience is Python developers that are at
risk of upgrades to their dependencies (including upgrades to Python itself)
breaking their software (e.g. developers using Python to script environments
where someone else is in control of the timing of dependency upgrades).
* ``FutureWarning``: always reported by default. The intended audience is users
of applications written in Python, rather than other Python developers
(e.g. warning about use of a deprecated setting in a configuration file
Given its presence in the standard library since Python 2.3, ``FutureWarning``
would then also have a secondary use case for libraries and frameworks that
support multiple Python versions: as a more reliably visible alternative to
``DeprecationWarning`` in Python 2.7 and versions of Python 3.x prior to 3.7.
As discussed in [1_] and mentioned in [2_], Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 changed
the default handling of ``DeprecationWarning`` such that:
* the warning was hidden by default during normal code execution
* the `unittest`` test runner was updated to re-enable it when running tests
The intent was to avoid cases of tooling output like the following::
$ devtool mycode/
DeprecationWarning: 'async' and 'await' will become reserved keywords
in Python 3.7
async = True
... actual tool output ...
Even when `devtool` is a tool specifically for Python programmers, this is not
a particularly useful warning, as it will be shown on every invocation, even
though the main helpful step an end user can take is to report a bug to the
developers of ``devtool``. The warning is even less helpful for general purpose
developer tools that are used across more languages than just Python.
However, this change proved to have unintended consequences for the following
* anyone using a test runner other than the default one built into ``unittest``
(since the request for third party test runners to change their default
warnings filters was never made explicitly)
* anyone using the default ``unittest`` test runner to test their Python code
in a subprocess (since even ``unittest`` only adjusts the warnings settings
in the current process)
* anyone writing Python code at the interactive prompt or as part of a directly
executed script that didn't have a Python level test suite at all
In these cases, ``DeprecationWarning`` ended up become almost entirely
equivalent to ``PendingDeprecationWarning``: it was simply never seen at all.
Limitations on PEP Scope
This PEP exists specifically to explain both the proposed addition to the
default warnings filter for 3.7, *and* to more clearly articulate the rationale
for the original change to the handling of DeprecationWarning back in Python 2.7
This PEP does not solve all known problems with the current approach to handling
deprecation warnings. Most notably:
* the default ``unittest`` test runner does not currently report deprecation
warnings emitted at module import time, as the warnings filter
override is only
put in place during test execution, not during test discovery and loading.
* the default ``unittest`` test runner does not currently report deprecation
warnings in subprocesses, as the warnings filter override is applied directly
to the loaded ``warnings`` module, not to the ``PYTHONWARNINGS`` environment
* the standard library doesn't provide a straightforward way to opt-in to seeing
all warnings emitted *by* a particular dependency prior to upgrading it
(the third-party ``warn`` module [3_] does provide this, but enabling it
involves monkeypatching the standard library's ``warnings`` module).
* re-enabling deprecation warnings by default in __main__ doesn't help in
handling cases where software has been factored out into support modules, but
those modules still have little or no automated test coverage. Near term, the
best currently available answer is to run such applications with
``python -W default::DeprecationWarning`` and pay attention to their
``stderr`` output. Longer term, this is really a question for researchers
working on static analysis of Python code: how to reliably find usage of
deprecated APIs, and how to infer that an API or parameter is deprecated
based on ``warnings.warn`` calls, without actually running either the code
providing the API or the code accessing it
While these are real problems with the status quo, they're excluded from
consideration in this PEP because they're going to require more complex
solutions than a single additional entry in the default warnings filter,
and resolving them at least potentially won't require going through the PEP
For anyone interested in pursuing them further, the first two would be
``unittest`` module enhancement requests, the third would be a ``warnings``
module enhancement request, while the last would only require a PEP if
inferring API deprecations from their contents was deemed to be an intractable
code analysis problem, and an explicit function and parameter marker syntax in
annotations was proposed instead.
..  stdlib-sig thread proposing the original default filter change
..  Python 2.7 notification of the default warnings filter change
..  Emitting warnings based on the location of the warning itself
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
More information about the Python-Dev