[Python-Dev] Timeout for PEP 550 / Execution Context discussion
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Mon Oct 16 01:04:31 EDT 2017
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 October 2017 at 11:33, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>
>> Stage 2. When Python 3.7 is out, we'll see how people use execution
>> contexts for async code and collect feedback. If we recognize that
>> Python users want execution contexts for generators/asynchronous
>> generators, we'll make a new PEP to add support for them in Python
>> 3.8. That future discussion will be focused on generators
>> specifically, and therefore I expect it to be somewhat more focused.
> As long as it's made clear that the interaction between context variables
> and generators is formally undefined in 3.7, I think that's reasonable -
> folks that want to ensure the current behaviour indefinitely should keep
> using thread locals rather than switching over to context variables.
It shouldn't be formally undefined. It should have the semantics it
acquires when you combine the existing (well-defined) formal semantics of
generators with the (to be defined) formal semantics of context variables.
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-Dev