[Python-Dev] PEP 572: Do we really need a ":" in ":="?
tim.peters at gmail.com
Thu Jul 5 23:33:32 EDT 2018
> It doesn't even exist yet, but Googling on
> python operator :=
> already returns a directly relevant hit on the first page for me:
[Guido, who later apologized for unclear quoting, hilariously trying to pin
the blame on GMail ;-)]
Since they moved to the "new" GMail, quoting selected pieces in replies has
become a nightmare for me too. I don't understand the options, and it
seems there's no option at all to do "just plain text, please - nothing
fancy" anymore :-(
Since this thread is dead and everybody is just posting to get the last
You're such a cynic. We're competing to get the _first_ word on something
destined to convince you that PEP 572 can be vastly improved via a
one-character change ;-)
> I can report that for me, Googling for "Python :=" gives PEP 572 as the
> first non-ad hit. Also among the top hits are section 6 (Expressions) and
> section 7 (Simple statements) of the Python 3.7.0 docs.
And I get essentially the same Google results too when I leave out
"operator" from my original
To verify the obvious guess, Googling on just plain
does indeed return hits supremely relevant to the colon-equal "symbol"
regardless of context.
Seems there is at least one thing that Google still does right. :-)
I'm sure it will be improved out of existence soon enough ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-Dev