[Python-Dev] Policy on refactoring/clean up
Jeroen Demeyer
J.Demeyer at UGent.be
Tue Jun 26 05:00:48 EDT 2018
Hello,
On https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/7909 I encountered friction
for a PR which I expected to be uncontroversial: it just moves some code
without changing any functionality.
So basically my question is: is there some CPython policy *against*
refactoring code to make it easier to read and write? (Note that I'm not
talking about pure style issues here)
Background: cpython has a source file "call.c" (introduced in
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12) but the corresponding
declarations are split over several .h files. While working on PEP 580,
I found this slightly confusing. I decided that it would make more sense
to group all these declarations in a new file "call.h". That's what PR
7909 does. In my opinion, the resulting code is easier to read. It also
defines a clear place for declarations of future functionality added to
"call.c" (for example, if we add a public API for FASTCALL). Finally, I
added/clarified a few comments.
I expected the PR to be either ignored or accepted. However, I received
a negative reaction from Inada Naoki on it.
I don't mind closing the PR and keeping the status quo if there is a
general agreement. However, I'm afraid that a future reviewer of PEP 580
might say "your includes are a mess" and he will be right.
Jeroen.
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list