[Python-Dev] new binary wheels PEP idea

[Alexander Revin]

Thank you guys! Will try it that way.

Best,
Alex

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:57 PM Steve Dower <steve.dower at python.org> wrote:
>
> And for what it's worth, most of the really active contributors from
> distutils-sig seem to prefer the "Packaging" category at
> https://discuss.python.org/
>
> If you'd prefer to use Discourse, I'd suggest posting there first and
> also email distutils-sig with a link to the discussion. Otherwise, go
> straight to distutils-sig (just don't be too surprised if you don't seem
> to get much traction there or if someone restarts the discussion on
> Discourse for you).
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
> On 19Feb2019 1341, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > Unfortunately you're still posted to the wrong list, Alexander. You want
> > to mail distutils-sig at python.org <mailto:distutils-sig at python.org> where
> > packaging discussions occur.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:19 AM Alexander Revin <lyssdod at gmail.com
> > <mailto:lyssdod at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi all,
> >
> >     I have an idea regarding Python binary wheels on non-glibc platforms,
> >     and it seems that initially I've posted it to the wrong list ([1])
> >
> >     Long story short, the proposal is to use platform tuples (like
> >     compiler ones) for wheel names, which will allow much broader platform
> >     support, for example:
> >
> >     package-1.0-cp36-cp36m-amd64_linux_gnu.whl
> >     package-1.0-cp36-cp36m-amd64_linux_musl.whl
> >
> >     So eventually only {platform tag} part will be modified. Glibc/musl
> >     detection is quite trivial and eventually will be based on existing
> >     one in PEP 513 [2].
> >
> >     Let me know what you think.
> >
> >     Best regards,
> >     Alex
> >
> >     [1]
> >     https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2019-February/739524.html
> >     [2] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0513/#id49
>