[Python-Dev] BDFL-Delegate appointments for several PEPs
J.Demeyer at UGent.be
Sun Mar 24 13:00:00 EDT 2019
On 2019-03-24 16:22, Mark Shannon wrote:
> Hi Petr,
> Regarding PEPs 576 and 580.
> Over the new year, I did a thorough analysis of possible approaches to
> possible calling conventions for use in the CPython ecosystems and came
> up with a new PEP.
> The draft can be found here:
Thanks for that. Is this new PEP meant to supersede PEP 576?
> I'd like to have a testable branch, before formally submitting the PEP,
> but I'd thought you should be aware of the PEP.
If you want to bring up this PEP now during the PEP 576/580 discussion,
maybe it's best to formally submit it now? Having an official PEP number
might simplify the discussion. If it turns out to be a bad idea after
all, you can still withdraw it.
In the mean time, I remind you that PEP 576 also doesn't have a complete
reference implementation (the PEP links to a "reference implementation"
but it doesn't correspond to the text of the PEP).
More information about the Python-Dev