[Python-Dev] Consolidating channel of record [was: 581 (Using GitHub issues for CPython) is accepted]

Stephen J. Turnbull turnbull.stephen.fw at u.tsukuba.ac.jp
Fri May 17 09:06:34 EDT 2019


Chris Barker - NOAA Federal writes:

 > Frankly, multiple long meandering threads in s single mailing list
 > are not s very good archive either.

True, but I have no idea how to address that administratively, except
to have a *very* strong moderator.

 > Ideally, the PEP is updated with a summary of the issues discussed
 > as the discussion unfolds.

The point of "channel of record" is not that it would replace the PEPs
themselves.  It's that PEP authors are people with time limitations,
too.

For example, there's at least one person currently requesting a review
on a PEP who has in the past loudly and publicly announced their
unsubscription from python-ideas and IIRC even python-dev.  I think
it's a good idea to have *one* place that is the principal source for
PEP protagonists who don't have time for or simply dislike
participating in some (or even all) of the channels du jour.  With a
designated channel of record, if discussions take place elsewhere, the
PEP protagonist *may*, but would be under *no obligation* to, follow
them or search for them.  In the current situation, there's an
implicit obligation for the protagonist to check all the channels,
maybe even to do a Google search.  Or at least some of the posters
seem to feel that way.

 > As the community seems to be moving to a wider variety of fora,
 > this will become all the more critical.

It would also be possible, I suppose, for the PEP protagonist to
designate a channel in the PEP.  That has its problems too (they can
choose a channel that is inconvenient for the majority of interested
participants, for example), but with a designated channel system of
either kind the problems are predictable and bounded.

Steve


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list