[Python-ideas] proto-PEP: Fixing Non-constant Default Arguments
jan.kanis at phil.uu.nl
Tue Jan 30 13:24:43 CET 2007
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:19:11 +0100, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett at gmail.com>
> On 1/30/07, Chris Rebert <cvrebert at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Also, due to the
>> hairiness/obscurity of the construct, hardly anyone uses it, so the
>> impact of removing it should be relatively minor.
> I just did found 181 such uses in my own installation. 29 were either
> 3rd-party or test code, but that still leaves over 150 uses in the
> standard library. It is possible that some of them would also work
> with your semantics, or may even be bugs today -- but you would have
> to go through them one-by-one as part of the PEP process.
Well, it seems that numbers are gonna be needed anyway to convince people.
But that's certainly possible. What exactly did you search for, and what
did you find?
I did some preliminary grepping through the standardlib myself. regex =
"def.*\(.*=.*\):", searching through all .py files in /Lib:
2455 matches in total in 474 files out of 998
I manually looked through the first bunch of files, those contained 145
matches. (the first files sorted alphabetically up until and including
cookielib.py) By far the most of them had literals as default value. A
huge amount of them used the =None idiom, I estimate perhaps one third.
10 matches used variables but will not break under the pep's semantics.
I found 1 (one) file that used the current semantics to keep state between
calls, in two inner functions. This can easily be changed.
So, that leaves 145-12=133 uses of default values that are just constants.
If I have time and figure out the right regexes I'll try and come up with
some more numbers on the entire stdlib, and the ammount of uses of =None.
More information about the Python-ideas