[Python-ideas] proto-PEP: Fixing Non-constant Default Arguments
Roman Susi
rnd at onego.ru
Tue Jan 30 20:48:57 CET 2007
Chris Rebert wrote:
> Roman Susi wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'd liked to say outright that this bad idea which complicates matters
[skip]
>
>> P.S. However, I may be wrong. In that case my syntax suggestion would
>> be this:
>>
>> def foo(non_const or []):
>> ...
>>
>> where [] is executed at runtime BECAUSE at def time non_const is
>> somehow True and that is enough to leave [] alone.
>> I have not checked, but I believe it is backward compatible.
>> Anyway, could you summarize both contr-argument and this syntax
>> proposal in the PEP?
>
>
> I don't quite understand exactly how this would work and would like more
> details on it, but once you've explained it, of course I'd be happy to
> include it in the next draft.
Simple.
def foo(non_const or []):
...
is equivalent to
def foo(non_const=None):
if non_const is None:
none_const = []
...
And this will be as before:
def foo(non_const=[]):
...
Also, I thing that programmers should not use subtle difference between
None and other False values, so something like
def foo(non_const=None):
non_const = none_const or []
is also valid.
Another approach (if you want to pursue the feature) could be
complication to name binding protocol.
a = []
will be as before, but default value assignment could trigger some extra
method. So, you can explicitly regulate your instance reaction to
default-value assignment:
class MyMutableList:
...
def __default__(self, old_default):
return old_default.copy()
Regards,
Roman
> - Chris Rebert
>
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list