[Python-ideas] Positional only arguments
Steven Bethard
steven.bethard at gmail.com
Mon May 21 10:18:58 CEST 2007
On 5/21/07, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> Also, your proposal assigns two quite different meanings
> to *. If it's followed by a name, it sucks up all remaining
> positional args, but if it's not, it can't suck up
> anything, since it's followed by more positional args!
Note this is also true of the * in PEP 3102.
STeVe
--
I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a
tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity.
--- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list