[Python-ideas] Optimistic Concurrency
rhamph at gmail.com
Tue Oct 14 23:12:29 CEST 2008
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 2:13 PM, <skip at pobox.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Adam" == Adam Olsen <rhamph at gmail.com> writes:
> Adam> Safethread's use of monitors eliminates data contention. The
> Adam> bigger problem is refcounting, which optimistic concurrency
> Adam> doesn't help.
> Thanks. I see Safethread hasn't had a release in awhile. Is it still
> up-to-date w.r.t. Subversion trunk?
Development has stalled due to lack of interest. It's not up-to-date,
but the current plan is to strip the GIL removal changes out of it
(leaving them in a separate branch), which should make it much easier
Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus
More information about the Python-ideas