[Python-ideas] About adding a new iterator method called "shuffled"
phd at phd.pp.ru
Thu Mar 26 19:01:33 CET 2009
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:43:35AM -0600, Adam Olsen wrote:
> Is it or is it not broken? That's all I want to know. "maybe" isn't
> good enough. "Not broken for small lists" implies it IS broken for
> large lists.
Practicality beats purity, IMHO. If shuffle cannot process a list
I cannot even fit into virtual memory - I don't care, really.
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ phd at phd.pp.ru
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
More information about the Python-ideas