[Python-ideas] About adding a new iterator method called "shuffled"

Oleg Broytmann phd at phd.pp.ru
Thu Mar 26 19:01:33 CET 2009

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:43:35AM -0600, Adam Olsen wrote:
> Is it or is it not broken?  That's all I want to know.  "maybe" isn't
> good enough.  "Not broken for small lists" implies it IS broken for
> large lists.

   Practicality beats purity, IMHO. If shuffle cannot process a list
I cannot even fit into virtual memory - I don't care, really.

     Oleg Broytmann            http://phd.pp.ru/            phd at phd.pp.ru
           Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.

More information about the Python-ideas mailing list