[Python-ideas] About adding a new iteratormethodcalled "shuffled"
Andrew McNabb
amcnabb at mcnabbs.org
Thu Mar 26 18:54:17 CET 2009
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:43:35AM -0600, Adam Olsen wrote:
>
> Is it or is it not broken? That's all I want to know. "maybe" isn't
> good enough. "Not broken for small lists" implies it IS broken for
> large lists.
>
> Disabling it (raising an exception for large lists) is of course just
> a stopgap measure. Better would be a PRNG with a much larger period..
> but of course that'd require more CPU time and more seed.
It's only broken in a theoretical sense. It's fun to think about, but I
wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
--
Andrew McNabb
http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/
PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55 8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list