[Python-ideas] Proposed addtion to urllib.parse in 3.1 (and urlparse in 2.7)
Arnaud Delobelle
arnodel at googlemail.com
Sat Mar 28 08:54:03 CET 2009
On 27 Mar 2009, at 19:29, Joel Bender wrote:
>> It's also possible that the order matters. I think an iterable of
>> tuples (such as returned by dict.items(), but any iterable will do)
>> would be an okay interface.
>
> Ordered dict then :-)
Why not use the same signature as dict.update()?
update(...)
D.update(E, **F) -> None. Update D from E and F: for k in E:
D[k] = E[k]
(if E has keys else: for (k, v) in E: D[k] = v) then: for k in F:
D[k] = F[k]
--
Arnaud
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list