[Python-ideas] Anonymizing the PyCon review process

Jesse Noller jnoller at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 02:42:35 CET 2009

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Dj Gilcrease <digitalxero at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote:

> This is true as well. And should be considered in stage one of the
> process, but a single talk that sucked I would say is not a basis to
> reject someone outright. I would say two poor talks @pycon in the past
> three years warrants a negative vote, but a single bad talk, unless
> the voter attended that talk in person, isnt justification for a
> negative vote.

You're welcome to offer your feedback to the pycon-pc, or pycon-org
mailing lists.


More information about the Python-ideas mailing list