[Python-ideas] Summary of for...else threads
g.brandl at gmx.net
Sun Oct 11 22:48:59 CEST 2009
Nick Coghlan schrieb:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>> Unless there are serious objections, I intend to post this summary to
>>> python-dev in a couple of days and ask for a ruling on the various
>>> suggestions (e.g. Yes, No, Write A PEP And It Will Be Considered).
>> 1. Excellent summary!
>> 2. After the discussions, my personal opinion has settled down as +1 on
>> retaining the status quo (but welcoming doc patches), +0 on
>> warning-if-no-break and -1 on the other options.
>> 3. This should probably go in a PEP regardless of the reaction from
>> python-dev. Rejected PEPs provide a good record of things we have
>> deliberately decided *not* to do.
> Having just seen Guido's latest post (i.e. he would omit the feature
> entirely if given the chance to redo the loop syntax and he's against
> adding a syntax warning), I'd suggest proposing a "Rejected PEP for the
> record" (with a link to Guido's post as the rejection).
Would an entry in PEP 3099 suffice?
Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less.
Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy
indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou
two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out.
More information about the Python-ideas