adam at atlas.st
Mon Sep 28 01:24:10 CEST 2009
How would that be different from [f(x) for x in u if cond(x)]?
On 27 Sep 2009, at 19:20, Josef Eschgfaeller wrote:
> It would be nice to have a syntax like
> [f(x) for x in u and cond(x)]
> instead of list(map(f,filter(cond,u))).
> For avoiding interference with a common and it could be
> [f(x) for x in u andcond cond(x)]
> or perhaps
> [f(x) for x in u with cond(x)]
> if this is not interfering.
> Josef Eschgfaeller
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
More information about the Python-ideas