[Python-ideas] @return?
Masklinn
masklinn at masklinn.net
Thu Apr 15 08:10:37 CEST 2010
On 15 Apr 2010, at 01:33 , Conrad Irwin wrote:
> I am also slightly against truly
> "anonymous" functions, if it doesn't fit inside a lambda, the name at
> least provides some compulsory documentation
Isn't that statement a bit disingenuous when considering that `for` or
`with` blocks can contain arbitrary complexity and not require any kind
of naming?
> and a reference point while debugging.
that can be useful, but again it's not like most python source provides
that.
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list